util/ioc.c: try to reassure Coverity about qemu_iovec_init_extended
Make it more obvious, that filling qiov corresponds to qiov allocation, which in turn corresponds to total_niov calculation, based on mid_niov (not mid_len). Still add an assertion to show that there should be no difference. [Added mingw "error: 'mid_iov' may be used uninitialized in this function" compiler error fix suggested by Vladimir. --Stefan] Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1405302) Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20190910090310.14032-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20190910090310.14032-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> fixup! util/ioc.c: try to reassure Coverity about qemu_iovec_init_extended
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									560009f2c8
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						d38d6de2a1
					
				| @ -423,7 +423,7 @@ void qemu_iovec_init_extended( | ||||
| { | ||||
|     size_t mid_head, mid_tail; | ||||
|     int total_niov, mid_niov = 0; | ||||
|     struct iovec *p, *mid_iov; | ||||
|     struct iovec *p, *mid_iov = NULL; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|     if (mid_len) { | ||||
|         mid_iov = qiov_slice(mid_qiov, mid_offset, mid_len, | ||||
| @ -446,7 +446,8 @@ void qemu_iovec_init_extended( | ||||
|         p++; | ||||
|     } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|     if (mid_len) { | ||||
|     assert(!mid_niov == !mid_len); | ||||
|     if (mid_niov) { | ||||
|         memcpy(p, mid_iov, mid_niov * sizeof(*p)); | ||||
|         p[0].iov_base = (uint8_t *)p[0].iov_base + mid_head; | ||||
|         p[0].iov_len -= mid_head; | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
						Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy