From the time we added RVA22U64 until now the spec didn't declare 'RVB'
as a dependency, using zba/zbb/zbs instead. Since then the RVA22 spec
[1] added the following in the 'RVA22U64 Mandatory Extensions' section:
"B Bit-manipulation instructions
Note: The B extension comprises the Zba, Zbb, and Zbs extensions. At the
time of RVA22U64's ratification, the B extension had not yet been
defined, and so RVA22U64 explicitly mandated Zba, Zbb, and Zbs instead.
Mandating B is equivalent."
It is also equivalent to QEMU (see riscv_cpu_validate_b() in
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c).
Finally, RVA23U64 [2] directly mentions RVB as a mandatory extension,
not citing zba/zbb/zbs.
To make it clear that RVA23U64 will extend RVA22U64 (i.e. RVA22 is a
parent of RVA23), use RVB in RVA22U64 as well.
(bios-tables-test change: RVB added to riscv,isa)
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/profiles.adoc#61-rva22u64-profile
[2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/blob/main/src/rva23-profile.adoc#rva23u64-profile
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250115184316.2344583-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
ssu64xl is defined in RVA22 as:
"sstatus.UXL must be capable of holding the value 2 (i.e., UXLEN=64 must
be supported)."
This is always true in TCG and it's mandatory for RVA23, so claim
support for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20250115184316.2344583-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shgatpa is defined in RVA22 as:
"For each supported virtual memory scheme SvNN supported in satp, the
corresponding hgatp SvNNx4 mode must be supported. The hgatp mode Bare
must also be supported."
Claim support for shgatpa since this is always true for TCG.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shvsatpa is defined in RVA22 as:
"All translation modes supported in satp must be supported in vsatp."
This is always true in TCG so let's claim support for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-8-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shvstvecd is defined in RVA22 as:
"vstvec.MODE must be capable of holding the value 0 (Direct).
When vstvec.MODE=Direct, vstvec.BASE must be capable of holding any
valid four-byte-aligned address."
This is always true for TCG so let's claim support for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shtvala is described in RVA22 as:
"htval must be written with the faulting guest physical address
in all circumstances permitted by the ISA."
This is the case since commit 3067553993, so claim support for shtvala.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shvstvala is defined in RVA22 as:
"vstval must be written in all cases described above for stval."
By "cases describe above" the doc refer to the description of sstvala:
"stval must be written with the faulting virtual address for load,
store, and instruction page-fault, access-fault, and misaligned
exceptions, and for breakpoint exceptions other than those caused by
execution of the EBREAK or C.EBREAK instructions. For
virtual-instruction and illegal-instruction exceptions, stval must be
written with the faulting instruction."
We already have sstvala, and our vstval follows the same rules as stval,
so we can claim to support shvstvala too.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
shcounterenw is defined in RVA22 as:
"For any hpmcounter that is not read-only zero, the corresponding bit in
hcounteren must be writable."
This is always true in TCG so let's claim support for it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20241218114026.1652352-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
As per the step 5 in the process documented in bios-tables-test.c,
generate the expected ACPI SRAT AML data file for RISC-V using the
rebuild-expected-aml.sh script and update the
bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
This is a new file being added for the first time. Hence, iASL diff
output is not added.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <a667480203b35508038176c8ce4722370294cc57.1723172696.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
As per process documented (steps 1-3) in bios-tables-test.c, add
empty AML data file for RISC-V ACPI SRAT table and add the entry
in bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <0e30216273f2f59916bc651350578d8e8bc3a75f.1723172696.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
As per the step 5 in the process documented in bios-tables-test.c,
generate the expected ACPI AML data files for RISC-V using the
rebuild-expected-aml.sh script and update the
bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
These are all new files being added for the first time. Hence, iASL diff
output is not added.
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240716144306.2432257-10-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
As per process documented (steps 1-3) in bios-tables-test.c, add empty
AML data files for RISC-V ACPI tables and add the entries in
bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h.
Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20240716144306.2432257-8-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
