A PF may automatically create VFs and the PF may be function 0.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20250116-reuse-v20-2-7cb370606368@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Disabled means it is a disabled SR-IOV VF and hidden from the guest.
Do not create DT when starting the system and also keep the disabled PCI
device not linked to DRC, which generates DT in case of hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat<sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat<sbhat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20250116-reuse-v20-1-7cb370606368@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
When an eBPF program cannot be attached, virtio_net_load_ebpf() returns
false, and virtio_net_device_realize() enters the code path to handle
errors because of this, but it causes NULL dereference because no error
is generated.
Change virtio_net_load_ebpf() to return false only when a fatal error
occurred.
Fixes: b5900dff14e5 ("hw/net: report errors from failing to use eBPF RSS FDs")
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-Id: <20250116-software-v1-1-9e5161b534d8@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
We now have a general note about versioned machine types getting
deprecated and removed at the beginning of the deprecated.rst file,
so we should also have a general note about this in removed-features.rst
(which will also apply to versioned non-x86 machine types) instead of
listing individual old machine types in the document.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20250116064644.65670-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
NPCM8XX SoC is the successor of the NPCM7XX. It features quad-core
Cortex-A35 (Armv8, 64-bit) CPUs and some additional peripherals.
This document describes the NPCM8XX SoC and an evaluation board
(NPCM 845 EVB).
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-18-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The PCS exists in NPCM8XX's GMAC1 and is used to control the SGMII
PHY. This implementation contains all the default registers and
the soft reset feature that are required to load the Linux kernel
driver. Further features have not been implemented yet.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-15-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
NPCM8XX adds a few new registers and have a different set of reset
values to the CLK modules. This patch supports them.
This patch doesn't support the new clock values generated by these
registers. Currently no modules use these new clock values so they
are not necessary at this point.
Implementation of these clocks might be required when implementing
these modules.
Reviewed-by: Titus Rwantare <titusr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-14-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
These 2 values are different between NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX
CLKs. So we add them to the class and assign different values
to them.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-13-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
A lot of NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX CLK modules share the same code,
this commit moves the NPCM7XX CLK to NPCM CLK for these
properties.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-12-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX have a different set of CLK registers. This
commit changes the name of the clk files to be used by both
NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX CLK modules.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-11-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The NPCM8xx GCR device can be accessed with 64-bit memory operations.
This patch supports that.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-10-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
NPCM8XX boot block stores the DRAM size in SCRPAD_B register in GCR
module. Since we don't simulate a detailed memory controller, we
need to store this information directly similar to the NPCM7XX's
INCTR3 register.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-9-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
These 2 values are different between NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX
GCRs. So we add them to the class and assign different values
to them.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-7-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
A lot of NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX GCR modules share the same code,
this commit moves the NPCM7XX GCR to NPCM GCR for these
properties.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-6-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
NPCM7XX and NPCM8XX have a different set of GCRs and the GCR module
needs to fit both. This commit changes the name of the GCR module.
Future commits will add the support for NPCM8XX GCRs.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-5-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This allows different FIUs to have different flash sizes, useful
in NPCM8XX which has multiple different sized FIU modules.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-4-wuhaotsh@google.com
[PMM: flash_size must be a uint64_t to build on 32-bit hosts]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The bootrom is a minimal bootrom used to load an NPCM8XX image.
The source code is located in the same repo as the NPCM7XX one:
github.com/google/vbootrom/tree/master/npcm8xx.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-3-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
This newer vbootrom supports NPCM8xx. Similar to the NPCM7XX one
it supports loading the UBoot from the SPI device and not more.
We updated the npcm7xx bootrom to be compiled from this version.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219184609.1839281-2-wuhaotsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
In t32_expandimm_imm(), we take an 8 bit value XY and construct a
32-bit value which might be of the form XY, 00XY00XY, XY00XY00, or
XYXYXYXY. We do this with multiplications, and we use an 'int' type.
For the cases where we're setting the high byte of the 32-bit value
to XY, this means that we do an integer multiplication that might
overflow, and rely on the -fwrapv semantics to keep this from being
undefined behaviour.
It's clearer to use an unsigned type here, because we're really
doing operations on the value considered as a set of bits. The
result is the same.
The return value from the function remains 'int', because this
is a decodetree !function function, and follows the API for those
functions.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Longfield <slongfield@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Roque Arcudia Hernandez <roqueh@google.com>
Message-id: 20250219165534.3387376-1-slongfield@google.com
[PMM: Rewrote the commit message]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
TYPE_CHIPIDEA models an IP block which is also used in TYPE_ZYNQ_MACHINE which
itself is not an IMX device. CONFIG_ZYNQ selects CONFIG_USB_EHCI_SYSBUS while
TYPE_CHIPIDEA is a separate compilation unit, so only works by accident if
CONFIG_IMX is given. Fix that by extracting CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA from CONFIG_IMX.
cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 616ec12d0fcc "hw/arm/xilinx_zynq: Fix USB port instantiation"
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20250209103604.29545-1-shentey@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Implicit default values are often hard to figure out, better
be explicit. Now that all boards explicitly set the number of
GIC external IRQs, remove the default values (displaying an
error message if it is out of range).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-9-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When not specified, Cortex-A9MP configures its GIC with 64 external
IRQs, (see commit a32134aad89 "arm:make the number of GIC interrupts
configurable"), and Cortex-15MP to 128 (see commit 528622421eb
"hw/cpu/a15mpcore: Correct default value for num-irq").
The Caldexa Highbank board however expects a fixed set of 128
interrupts (see the fixed IRQ length when this board was added in
commit 2488514cef2 ("arm: SoC model for Calxeda Highbank"). Add the
GIC_EXT_IRQS definition (with a comment) to make that explicit.
Except explicitly setting a property value to its same implicit
value, there is no logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-8-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When not specified, Cortex-A9MP configures its GIC with 64 external
IRQs, (see commit a32134aad89 "arm:make the number of GIC interrupts
configurable"), and Cortex-15MP to 128 (see commit 528622421eb
"hw/cpu/a15mpcore: Correct default value for num-irq").
The Versatile Express board however expects a fixed set of 64
interrupts (see the fixed IRQ length when this board was added in
commit 2055283bcc8 ("hw/vexpress: Add model of ARM Versatile Express
board"). Add the GIC_EXT_IRQS definition (with a comment) to make
that explicit.
Except explicitly setting a property value to its same implicit
value, there is no logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-7-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Looking at the Zynq 7000 SoC Technical Reference Manual (UG585 v1.14)
on Appendix A: Register Details, the mpcore Interrupt Controller Type
Register (ICDICTR) has the IT_Lines_Number field read-only with value
0x2, described as:
IT_Lines_Number
b00010 = the distributor provides 96 interrupts,
64 external interrupt lines.
Add a GIC_EXT_IRQS definition (with a comment) to make the number of
GIC external IRQs explicit.
Except explicitly setting a property value to its same implicit
value, there is no logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-6-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We already have a definition to distinct GIC internal
IRQs versus external ones, use it. No logical changes.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-5-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When not specified, Cortex-A9MP configures its GIC with 64 external
IRQs (see commit a32134aad89 "arm:make the number of GIC interrupts
configurable"). Add the GIC_EXT_IRQS definition (with a comment)
to make that explicit.
Except explicitly setting a property value to its same implicit
value, there is no logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-4-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
When not specified, Cortex-A9MP configures its GIC with 64 external
IRQs (see commit a32134aad89 "arm:make the number of GIC interrupts
configurable"). Add the GIC_EXT_IRQS definition (with a comment)
to make that explicit.
Except explicitly setting a property value to its same implicit
value, there is no logical change intended.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-3-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The 32 IRQ lines skipped are the GIC internal ones.
Use the GIC_INTERNAL definition for clarity.
No logical change.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250212154333.28644-2-philmd@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The code for WFI/WFE trapping has several errors:
* it wasn't using arm_sctlr(), so it would look at SCTLR_EL1
even if the CPU was in the EL2&0 translation regime
* it was raising UNDEF, not Monitor Trap, for traps to
AArch32 EL3 because of SCR.{TWE,TWI}
* it was not honouring SCR.{TWE,TWI} when running in
AArch32 at EL3 not in Monitor mode
* it checked SCR.{TWE,TWI} even on v7 CPUs which don't have
those bits
Fix these bugs.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: b1eced713d99 ("target-arm: Add WFx instruction trap support")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED is technically an accurate description
of what this return value from a cpreg accessfn does, but it's liable
to confusion because it doesn't match how the Arm ARM pseudocode
indicates this case. What it does is an EXCP_UDEF with a zero
("uncategorized") syndrome value, which is what an UNDEFINED instruction
does. The pseudocode uses "UNDEFINED" to show this; rename our
constant to CP_ACCESS_UNDEFINED to make the parallel clearer.
Commit created with
sed -i -e 's/CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED/CP_ACCESS_UNDEFINED/' $(git grep -l CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED)
plus manual editing of the comment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
There are no longer any uses of CP_ACCESS_TRAP in access functions,
because we have converted them all to use either CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL1
or CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED, as appropriate. Remove the handling
of bare CP_ACCESS_TRAP from the access_check_cp_reg() helper, so that
it now asserts if an access function returns a value requesting a
trap without a target EL.
Rename CP_ACCESS_TRAP to CP_ACCESS_TRAP_BIT, to make it clearer
that this is an internal-only definition, not something that
it makes sense to return from an access function. This should
help to avoid future bugs where we return the wrong syndrome
value by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
On XScale CPUs, there is no EL2 or AArch64, so no syndrome register.
These traps are just UNDEFs in the traditional AArch32 sense, so
CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED is more accurate than CP_ACCESS_TRAP.
This has no visible behavioural change, because the guest doesn't
have a way to see the syndrome value we generate.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We currently use CP_ACCESS_TRAP in a number of access functions where
we know we're currently at EL0; in this case the "usual target EL"
is EL1, so CP_ACCESS_TRAP and CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL1 behave the same.
Use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL1 to more closely match the pseudocode for
this sort of check.
Note that in the case of the access functions foc cacheop to
PoC or PoU, the code was correct but the comment was wrong:
SCTLR_EL1.UCI traps for DC CVAC, DC CIVAC, DC CVAP, DC CVADP,
DC CVAU and IC IVAU should be system access traps, not UNDEFs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the CPAccessResult enum, the CP_ACCESS_TRAP* values indicate the
equivalent of the pseudocode AArch64.SystemAccessTrap(..., 0x18),
causing a trap to a specified exception level with a syndrome value
giving information about the failing instructions. In the
pseudocode, such traps are always taken to a specified target EL. We
support that for target EL of 2 or 3 via CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2 and
CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3, but the only way to take the access trap to EL1
currently is to use CP_ACCESS_TRAP, which takes the trap to the
"usual target EL" (EL1 if in EL0, otherwise to the current EL).
Add CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL1 so that access functions can follow the
pseudocode more closely.
(Note that for the common case in the pseudocode of "trap to
EL2 if HCR_EL2.TGE is set, otherwise trap to EL1", we handle
this in raise_exception(), so access functions don't need to
special case it and can use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL1.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the gicv3_{irq,fiq,irqfiq}_access() functions, in the
arm_current_el(env) == 3 case we do the following test:
if (!is_a64(env) && !arm_is_el3_or_mon(env)) {
r = CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3;
}
In this check, the "!is_a64(env)" is redundant, because if
we are at EL3 and in AArch64 then arm_is_el3_or_mon() will
return true and we will skip the if() body anyway.
Remove the unnecessary tests.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
There are not many traps in AArch32 which should trap to Monitor
mode, but these trap bits should trap not just lower ELs to Monitor
mode but also the non-Monitor modes running at EL3 (i.e. Secure
System, Secure Undef, etc).
We get this wrong because the relevant access functions implement the
AArch64-style logic of
if (el < 3 && trap_bit_set) {
return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3;
}
which won't trap the non-Monitor modes at EL3.
Correct this error by using arm_is_el3_or_mon() instead, which
returns true when the CPU is at AArch64 EL3 or AArch32 Monitor mode.
(Since the new callsites are compiled also for the linux-user mode,
we need to provide a dummy implementation for CONFIG_USER_ONLY.)
This affects only:
* trapping of ERRIDR via SCR.TERR
* trapping of the debug channel registers via SDCR.TDCC
* trapping of GICv3 registers via SCR.IRQ and SCR.FIQ
(which we already used arm_is_el3_or_mon() for)
This patch changes the handling of SCR.TERR and SDCR.TDCC. This
patch only changes guest-visible behaviour for "-cpu max" on
the qemu-system-arm binary, because SCR.TERR
and SDCR.TDCC (and indeed the entire SDCR register) only arrived
in Armv8, and the only guest CPU we support which has any v8
features and also starts in AArch32 EL3 is the 32-bit 'max'.
Other uses of CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3 don't need changing:
* uses in code paths that can't happen when EL3 is AArch32:
access_trap_aa32s_el1, cpacr_access, cptr_access, nsacr_access
* uses which are in accessfns for AArch64-only registers:
gt_stimer_access, gt_cntpoff_access, access_hxen, access_tpidr2,
access_smpri, access_smprimap, access_lor_ns, access_pauth,
access_mte, access_tfsr_el2, access_scxtnum, access_fgt
* trap bits which exist only in the AArch64 version of the
trap register, not the AArch32 one:
access_tpm, pmreg_access, access_dbgvcr32, access_tdra,
access_tda, access_tdosa (TPM, TDA and TDOSA exist only in
MDCR_EL3, not in SDCR, and we enforce this in sdcr_write())
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the gicv3_{irq,fiq,irqfiq}_access() functions, there is a check
which downgrades a CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3 to CP_ACCESS_TRAP if EL3 is not
AArch64. This has been there since the GIC was first implemented,
but it isn't right: if we are trapping because of SCR.IRQ or SCR.FIQ
then we definitely want to be going to EL3 (doing
AArch32.TakeMonitorTrapException() in pseudocode terms). We might
want to not take a trap at all, but we don't ever want to go to the
default target EL, because that would mean, for instance, taking a
trap to Hyp mode if the trapped access was made from Hyp mode.
(This might have been an attempt to work around our failure to
properly implement Monitor Traps.)
Remove the bogus check.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 359fbe65e01e ("hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICv3 CPU interface registers")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In system register access pseudocode the common pattern for
AArch32 registers with access traps to EL3 is:
at EL1 and EL2:
if HaveEL(EL3) && !ELUsingAArch32(EL3) && (SCR_EL3.TERR == 1) then
AArch64.AArch32SystemAccessTrap(EL3, 0x03);
elsif HaveEL(EL3) && ELUsingAArch32(EL3) && (SCR.TERR == 1) then
AArch32.TakeMonitorTrapException();
at EL3:
if (PSTATE.M != M32_Monitor) && (SCR.TERR == 1) then
AArch32.TakeMonitorTrapException();
(taking as an example the ERRIDR access pseudocode).
This implements the behaviour of (in this case) SCR.TERR that
"Accesses to the specified registers from modes other than Monitor
mode generate a Monitor Trap exception" and of SCR_EL3.TERR that
"Accesses of the specified Error Record registers at EL2 and EL1
are trapped to EL3, unless the instruction generates a higher
priority exception".
In QEMU we don't implement this pattern correctly in two ways:
* in access_check_cp_reg() we turn the CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3 into
an UNDEF, not a trap to Monitor mode
* in the access functions, we check trap bits like SCR.TERR
only when arm_current_el(env) < 3 -- this is correct for
AArch64 EL3, but misses the "trap non-Monitor-mode execution
at EL3 into Monitor mode" case for AArch32 EL3
In this commit we fix the first of these two issues, by
making access_check_cp_reg() handle CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3
as a Monitor trap. This is a kind of exception that we haven't
yet implemented(!), so we need a new EXCP_MON_TRAP for it.
This diverges from the pseudocode approach, where every access check
function explicitly checks for "if EL3 is AArch32" and takes a
monitor trap; if we wanted to be closer to the pseudocode we could
add a new CP_ACCESS_TRAP_MONITOR and make all the accessfns use it
when appropriate. But because there are no non-standard cases in the
pseudocode (i.e. where either it raises a Monitor trap that doesn't
correspond to an AArch64 SystemAccessTrap or where it raises a
SystemAccessTrap that doesn't correspond to a Monitor trap), handling
this all in one place seems less likely to result in future bugs
where we forgot again about this special case when writing an
accessor.
(The cc of stable here is because "hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif: Don't
downgrade monitor traps for AArch32 EL3" which is also cc:stable
will implicitly use the new EXCP_MON_TRAP code path.)
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The pseudocode for the accessors for the LOR sysregs says they
are UNDEFINED if SCR_EL3.NS is 0. We were reporting the wrong
syndrome value here; use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 2d7137c10faf ("target/arm: Implement the ARMv8.1-LOR extension")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The pseudocode for AT S1E2R and AT S1E2W says that they should be
UNDEFINED if executed at EL3 when EL2 is not enabled. We were
incorrectly using CP_ACCESS_TRAP and reporting the wrong exception
syndrome as a result. Use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 2a47df953202e1 ("target-arm: Wire up AArch64 EL2 and EL3 address translation ops")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
R_NYXTL says that these AT insns should be UNDEFINED if they
would operate on an EL lower than EL3 and SCR_EL3.{NSE,NS} is
set to the Reserved {1, 0}. We were incorrectly reporting
them with the wrong syndrome; use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED
so they are reported as UNDEFINED.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 1acd00ef1410 ("target/arm/helper: Check SCR_EL3.{NSE, NS} encoding for AT instructions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The access pseudocode for the CNTPS_TVAL_EL1, CNTPS_CTL_EL1 and
CNTPS_CVAL_EL1 secure timer registers says that they are UNDEFINED
from EL2 or NS EL1. We incorrectly return CP_ACCESS_TRAP from the
access function in these cases, which means that we report the wrong
syndrome value to the target EL.
Use CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED, which reports the correct syndrome
value for an UNDEFINED instruction.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: b4d3978c2fd ("target-arm: Add the AArch64 view of the Secure physical timer")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20250130182309.717346-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the code in net/slirp.c to be compatible with
libslirp 4.9.0, which deprecated slirp_pollfds_fill()
and started using slirp_os_socket type for sockets
(which is a 64-bit integer on win64) for all callbacks
starting with version 6 of the interface.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Message-ID: <20250130123253.864681-1-mjt@tls.msk.ru>
[thuth: Added some spaces to make checkpatch.pl happy]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit f141caa270af536b4d5b7c8540820f1bdd245d71)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
The gdbstub implementation for the Sparc architecture would
incorrectly calculate the the floating point register offset.
This resulted in, for example, registers f32 and f34 to point to
the same value.
The issue was caused by the confusion between even register numbers
and even register indexes. For example, the register index of f32 is 64
and f34 is 65.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 30038fd81808 ("target-sparc: Change fpr representation to doubles.")
Signed-off-by: Mikael Szreder <git@miszr.win>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250214070343.11501-1-git@miszr.win>
(cherry picked from commit 7a74e468089a58756b438d31a2a9a97f183780d7)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
A bug was introduced in commit 0bba7572d40d which causes the fdtox
and fqtox instructions to incorrectly select the destination registers.
More information and a test program can be found in issue #2802.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: 0bba7572d40d ("target/sparc: Perform DFPREG/QFPREG in decodetree")
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2802
Signed-off-by: Mikael Szreder <git@miszr.win>
Acked-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
[rth: Squash patches together, since the second fixes a typo in the first.]
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250205090333.19626-3-git@miszr.win>
(cherry picked from commit 807c3ebd1e3fc2a1be6cdfc702ccea3fa0d2d9b2)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
When complying with the alignment requested in the ELF and unmapping
the excess reservation, having align_end not aligned to the guest page
causes the unmap to be rejected by the alignment check at
target_munmap and later brk adjustments hit an EEXIST.
Fix by aligning the start of region to be unmapped.
Fixes: c81d1fafa6 ("linux-user: Honor elf alignment when placing images")
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1913
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
[rth: Align load_end as well.]
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250213143558.10504-1-farosas@suse.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4b7b20a3b72c5000ea71bef505c16e6e628268b6)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
