vhost: don't send RESET_OWNER at stop
First of all, RESET_OWNER message is sent incorrectly, as it's sent before GET_VRING_BASE. And the reset message would let the later call get nothing correct. And, sending SET_VRING_ENABLE at stop, which has already been done, makes more sense than RESET_OWNER. Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									923e2d98ed
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						12b8cbac3c
					
				| @ -292,12 +292,6 @@ static void vhost_net_stop_one(struct vhost_net *net, | ||||
|             int r = vhost_ops->vhost_net_set_backend(&net->dev, &file); | ||||
|             assert(r >= 0); | ||||
|         } | ||||
|     } else if (net->nc->info->type == NET_CLIENT_OPTIONS_KIND_VHOST_USER) { | ||||
|         for (file.index = 0; file.index < net->dev.nvqs; ++file.index) { | ||||
|             const VhostOps *vhost_ops = net->dev.vhost_ops; | ||||
|             int r = vhost_ops->vhost_reset_device(&net->dev); | ||||
|             assert(r >= 0); | ||||
|         } | ||||
|     } | ||||
|     if (net->nc->info->poll) { | ||||
|         net->nc->info->poll(net->nc, true); | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 Yuanhan Liu
						Yuanhan Liu