hw/display/qxl: Suppress clang-7 warning about misaligned atomic operation
If QEMU is compiled with clang-7 it results in the warning:
hw/display/qxl.c:1884:19: error: misaligned or large atomic operation
may incur significant performance penalty [-Werror,-Watomic-alignment]
    old_pending = atomic_fetch_or(&d->ram->int_pending, le_events);
                  ^
This is because the Spice headers forgot to define the QXLRam struct
with the '__aligned__(4)' attribute.  clang 7 and newer will thus
warn that the access here to int_pending might not be 4-aligned
(because the QXLRam object d->ram points at might start at a
misaligned address).  In fact we set up d->ram in init_qxl_ram() so
it always starts at a 4K boundary, so we know the atomic access here
is OK.
Newer Spice versions (with Spice commit
beda5ec7a6848be20c0cac2a9a8ef2a41e8069c1) will fix the bug;
for older Spice versions, work around it by telling the compiler
explicitly that the alignment is OK using __builtin_assume_aligned().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20180927155538.699-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									1242429b20
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						5a358b39f5
					
				| @ -1893,7 +1893,31 @@ static void qxl_send_events(PCIQXLDevice *d, uint32_t events) | ||||
|         trace_qxl_send_events_vm_stopped(d->id, events); | ||||
|         return; | ||||
|     } | ||||
|     old_pending = atomic_fetch_or(&d->ram->int_pending, le_events); | ||||
|     /*
 | ||||
|      * Older versions of Spice forgot to define the QXLRam struct | ||||
|      * with the '__aligned__(4)' attribute. clang 7 and newer will | ||||
|      * thus warn that atomic_fetch_or(&d->ram->int_pending, ...) | ||||
|      * might be a misaligned atomic access, and will generate an | ||||
|      * out-of-line call for it, which results in a link error since | ||||
|      * we don't currently link against libatomic. | ||||
|      * | ||||
|      * In fact we set up d->ram in init_qxl_ram() so it always starts | ||||
|      * at a 4K boundary, so we know that &d->ram->int_pending is | ||||
|      * naturally aligned for a uint32_t. Newer Spice versions | ||||
|      * (with Spice commit beda5ec7a6848be20c0cac2a9a8ef2a41e8069c1) | ||||
|      * will fix the bug directly. To deal with older versions, | ||||
|      * we tell the compiler to assume the address really is aligned. | ||||
|      * Any compiler which cares about the misalignment will have | ||||
|      * __builtin_assume_aligned. | ||||
|      */ | ||||
| #ifdef HAS_ASSUME_ALIGNED | ||||
| #define ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(P) ((uint32_t *)__builtin_assume_aligned(P, 4)) | ||||
| #else | ||||
| #define ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(P) ((uint32_t *)P) | ||||
| #endif | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|     old_pending = atomic_fetch_or(ALIGNED_UINT32_PTR(&d->ram->int_pending), | ||||
|                                   le_events); | ||||
|     if ((old_pending & le_events) == le_events) { | ||||
|         return; | ||||
|     } | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -122,6 +122,15 @@ | ||||
| #ifndef __has_feature | ||||
| #define __has_feature(x) 0 /* compatibility with non-clang compilers */ | ||||
| #endif | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| #ifndef __has_builtin | ||||
| #define __has_builtin(x) 0 /* compatibility with non-clang compilers */ | ||||
| #endif | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| #if __has_builtin(__builtin_assume_aligned) || QEMU_GNUC_PREREQ(4, 7) | ||||
| #define HAS_ASSUME_ALIGNED | ||||
| #endif | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| /* Implement C11 _Generic via GCC builtins.  Example:
 | ||||
|  * | ||||
|  *    QEMU_GENERIC(x, (float, sinf), (long double, sinl), sin) (x) | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 Peter Maydell
						Peter Maydell