hw/intc/arm_gic: Fix handling of GICD_ITARGETSR
The GICD_ITARGETSR implementation still has some 11MPCore behaviour that we were incorrectly using in our GICv1 and GICv2 implementations for the case where the interrupt number is less than GIC_INTERNAL. The desired behaviour here is: * for 11MPCore: RAZ/WI for irqs 0..28; read a number matching the CPU doing the read for irqs 29..31 * for GICv1 and v2: RAZ/WI if uniprocessor; otherwise read a number matching the CPU doing the read for all irqs < 32 Stop squashing GICD_ITARGETSR to 0 for IRQs 0..28 unless this is an 11MPCore GIC. Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com> Message-id: 20180712154152.32183-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									ee03cca88e
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						7995206d05
					
				@ -751,7 +751,9 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq >= s->num_irq) {
 | 
			
		||||
                goto bad_reg;
 | 
			
		||||
            }
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq >= 29 && irq <= 31) {
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq < 29 && s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
 | 
			
		||||
                res = 0;
 | 
			
		||||
            } else if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {
 | 
			
		||||
                res = cm;
 | 
			
		||||
            } else {
 | 
			
		||||
                res = GIC_TARGET(irq);
 | 
			
		||||
@ -1014,7 +1016,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq >= s->num_irq) {
 | 
			
		||||
                goto bad_reg;
 | 
			
		||||
            }
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq < 29) {
 | 
			
		||||
            if (irq < 29 && s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
 | 
			
		||||
                value = 0;
 | 
			
		||||
            } else if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {
 | 
			
		||||
                value = ALL_CPU_MASK;
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user