Document QEMU coding style (v2) (Avi Kivity)
With the help of some Limoncino I noted several aspects of the QEMU coding style, particularly where it differs from the Linux coding style as many contributors work on both projects. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6976 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8eca6b1bc7
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						e68b98dc72
					
				
							
								
								
									
										78
									
								
								CODING_STYLE
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										78
									
								
								CODING_STYLE
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							| @ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | ||||
| Qemu Coding Style | ||||
| ================= | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 1. Whitespace | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace. | ||||
| Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses | ||||
| can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance | ||||
| of approximately fifteen parsecs.  Many a flamewar have been fought and | ||||
| lost on this issue. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| QEMU indents are four spaces.  Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles | ||||
| where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax by some moron. | ||||
| Spaces of course are superior to tabs because: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  - You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two.  Ambiguity breeds | ||||
|    mistakes. | ||||
|  - The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone. | ||||
|  - Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously | ||||
|    unbalanced. | ||||
|  - Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not | ||||
|    to use tab stops of eight positions. | ||||
|  - Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost | ||||
|    every line. | ||||
|  - It is the QEMU coding style. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 2. Line width | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Lines are 80 characters; not longer. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Rationale: | ||||
|  - Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24 | ||||
|    xterms and use vi in all of them.  The best way to punish them is to | ||||
|    let them keep doing it. | ||||
|  - Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane | ||||
|    line length.  Eighty is traditional. | ||||
|  - It is the QEMU coding style. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 3. Naming | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read.  Structured | ||||
| type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Scalar type | ||||
| names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX | ||||
| uint64_t and family.  Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX | ||||
| and is therefore likely to be changed. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword.  It is the | ||||
| QEMU coding style. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 4. Block structure | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one | ||||
| statement.  The opening brace is on the line that contains the control | ||||
| flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the | ||||
| same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else | ||||
| keyword.  Example: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|     if (a == 5) { | ||||
|         printf("a was 5.\n"); | ||||
|     } else if (a == 6) { | ||||
|         printf("a was 6.\n"); | ||||
|     } else { | ||||
|         printf("a was something else entirely.\n"); | ||||
|     } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition | ||||
| and clarity it comes on a line by itself: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|     void a_function(void) | ||||
|     { | ||||
|         do_something(); | ||||
|     } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces | ||||
| ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed. | ||||
| Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style. | ||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	 aliguori
						aliguori