Document QEMU coding style (v2) (Avi Kivity)
With the help of some Limoncino I noted several aspects of the QEMU coding style, particularly where it differs from the Linux coding style as many contributors work on both projects. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6976 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8eca6b1bc7
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						e68b98dc72
					
				
							
								
								
									
										78
									
								
								CODING_STYLE
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										78
									
								
								CODING_STYLE
									
									
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					Qemu Coding Style
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					=================
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					1. Whitespace
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					of approximately fifteen parsecs.  Many a flamewar have been fought and
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					lost on this issue.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					QEMU indents are four spaces.  Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax by some moron.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two.  Ambiguity breeds
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   mistakes.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   unbalanced.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   to use tab stops of eight positions.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   every line.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - It is the QEMU coding style.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					2. Line width
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Lines are 80 characters; not longer.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Rationale:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   xterms and use vi in all of them.  The best way to punish them is to
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   let them keep doing it.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					   line length.  Eighty is traditional.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 - It is the QEMU coding style.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					3. Naming
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read.  Structured
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Scalar type
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					uint64_t and family.  Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					and is therefore likely to be changed.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Typedefs are used to eliminate the redundant 'struct' keyword.  It is the
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					QEMU coding style.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					4. Block structure
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					statement.  The opening brace is on the line that contains the control
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					keyword.  Example:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    if (a == 5) {
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					        printf("a was 5.\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    } else if (a == 6) {
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					        printf("a was 6.\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    } else {
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					        printf("a was something else entirely.\n");
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    }
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    void a_function(void)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    {
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					        do_something();
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					    }
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style.
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user