In case of -EAGAIN returned by update_refcount(), we should discard the cluster offset we were trying to allocate and request a new one, because in theory that old offset might now be taken by a refcount block. In practice, this was not the case due to update_refcount() generally returning strictly monotonic increasing cluster offsets. However, this behavior is not set in stone, and it is also not obvious when looking at qcow2_alloc_bytes() alone, so we should not rely on it. Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
…
…
Read the documentation in qemu-doc.html or on http://wiki.qemu-project.org - QEMU team
Description
Languages
C
90.3%
Dylan
2.5%
Python
2.1%
C++
2%
Shell
1.7%
Other
1.4%