From c498c117c4de7011ede84acca2cce79c524b219f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hengqi Chen Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 16:31:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: BPF: Use move_addr() for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC commit 52266f1015a8b5aabec7d127f83d105f702b388e upstream. Vincent reported that running XDP synproxy program on LoongArch results in the following error: JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls With dmesg: multi-func JIT bug 1391 != 1390 The root cause is that verifier will refill the imm with the correct addresses of bpf_calls for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC instructions and then run the last pass of JIT. So we generate different JIT code for the same instruction in two passes (one for placeholder and the other for the real address). Let's use move_addr() instead. See commit 64f50f6575721ef0 ("LoongArch, bpf: Use 4 instructions for function address in JIT") for a similar fix. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Fixes: bb035ef0cc91 ("LoongArch: BPF: Support mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls") Reported-by: Vincent Li Tested-by: Vincent Li Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/CAK3+h2yfM9FTNiXvEQBkvtuoJrvzmN4c_NZsFXqEk4Cj1tsBNA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c index 7a8d3c148706..d53919729f92 100644 --- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c @@ -810,7 +810,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext { const u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm; - move_imm(ctx, dst, imm64, is32); + if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) + move_addr(ctx, dst, imm64); + else + move_imm(ctx, dst, imm64, is32); return 1; }