docs: discourage use of list tables
Our documentation encourages the use of list-table formats, but that advice runs counter to the objective of keeping the plain-text documentation as useful and readable as possible. Turn that advice around the other way so that people don't keep adding these tables. Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf33a9d42d
commit
db67eb748e
@ -261,12 +261,11 @@ please feel free to remove it.
|
|||||||
list tables
|
list tables
|
||||||
-----------
|
-----------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We recommend the use of *list table* formats. The *list table* formats are
|
The list-table formats can be useful for tables that are not easily laid
|
||||||
double-stage lists. Compared to the ASCII-art they might not be as
|
out in the usual Sphinx ASCII-art formats. These formats are nearly
|
||||||
comfortable for
|
impossible for readers of the plain-text documents to understand, though,
|
||||||
readers of the text files. Their advantage is that they are easy to
|
and should be avoided in the absence of a strong justification for their
|
||||||
create or modify and that the diff of a modification is much more meaningful,
|
use.
|
||||||
because it is limited to the modified content.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The ``flat-table`` is a double-stage list similar to the ``list-table`` with
|
The ``flat-table`` is a double-stage list similar to the ``list-table`` with
|
||||||
some additional features:
|
some additional features:
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user