llvm-for-llvmta/test/Transforms/InstCombine/infinite-loop-postdom.ll

223 lines
5.8 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -branch-prob -instcombine -block-freq -verify-dom-info
; RUN: opt < %s -postdomtree -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK-POSTDOM %s
; RUN: opt < %s -passes='print<postdomtree>' 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefixes=CHECK-POSTDOM %s
; Demonstrate that Predicate Canonicalization (InstCombine) does not invalidate PostDomTree
; if the basic block is post-dom unreachable.
define void @test1(i24 %a, i24 %b) {
entry:
br label %LOOP
LOOP:
%f = icmp uge i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f, label %B1, label %B2
B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %B2
B2:
br label %LOOP
}
; The same as @test1 except the LOOP condition canonicalized (as by instcombine).
define void @test1-canonicalized(i24 %a, i24 %b) {
entry:
br label %LOOP
LOOP:
%f.not = icmp ult i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f.not, label %B2, label %B1
B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %B2
B2:
br label %LOOP
}
; The same as @test1 but different order of B1 and B2 in the function.
; The different order makes PostDomTree different in presense of postdom
; unreachable blocks.
define void @test2(i24 %a, i24 %b) {
entry:
br label %LOOP
LOOP:
%f = icmp uge i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f, label %B1, label %B2
B2:
br label %LOOP
B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %B2
}
; The same as @test2 except the LOOP condition canonicalized (as by instcombine).
define void @test2-canonicalized(i24 %a, i24 %b) {
entry:
br label %LOOP
LOOP:
%f.not = icmp ult i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f.not, label %B2, label %B1
B2:
br label %LOOP
B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %B2
}
; Two reverse unreachable subgraphs with RU1* and RU2* basic blocks respectively.
define void @test3(i24 %a, i24 %b, i32 %flag) {
entry:
switch i32 %flag, label %EXIT [
i32 1, label %RU1
i32 2, label %RU2
i32 3, label %RU2_B1
]
RU1:
%f = icmp uge i24 %a, %b
br label %RU1_LOOP
RU1_LOOP:
br i1 %f, label %RU1_B1, label %RU1_B2
RU1_B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %RU1_B2
RU1_B2:
br label %RU1_LOOP
RU2:
%f2 = icmp uge i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f2, label %RU2_B1, label %RU2_B2
RU2_B1:
br label %RU2_B2
RU2_B2:
br label %RU2_B1
EXIT:
ret void
}
; The same as @test3 except the icmp conditions are canonicalized (as by instcombine).
define void @test3-canonicalized(i24 %a, i24 %b, i32 %flag) {
entry:
switch i32 %flag, label %EXIT [
i32 1, label %RU1
i32 2, label %RU2
i32 3, label %RU2_B1
]
RU1:
%f.not = icmp ult i24 %a, %b
br label %RU1_LOOP
RU1_LOOP:
br i1 %f.not, label %RU1_B2, label %RU1_B1
RU1_B1:
%x = add i24 %a, %b
br label %RU1_B2
RU1_B2:
br label %RU1_LOOP
RU2:
%f2.not = icmp ult i24 %a, %b
br i1 %f2.not, label %RU2_B2, label %RU2_B1
RU2_B1:
br label %RU2_B2
RU2_B2:
br label %RU2_B1
EXIT:
ret void
}
; PostDomTrees of @test1(), @test2() and @test3() are different.
; PostDomTrees of @testX() and @testX-canonicalize() are the same.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: =============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Roots: %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test1-canonicalized
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: =============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Roots: %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: =============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Roots: %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test2-canonicalized
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: =============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: Roots: %B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test3
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:=============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %EXIT
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %RU1_B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU1_LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %RU1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %RU1_B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %RU2_B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU2_B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:Roots: %EXIT %RU1_B1 %RU2_B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-LABEL: test3-canonicalized
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:=============================--------------------------------
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:Inorder PostDominator Tree: DFSNumbers invalid: 0 slow queries.
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [1] <<exit node>>
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %EXIT
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %entry
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %RU1_B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU1_LOOP
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %RU1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [4] %RU1_B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [2] %RU2_B1
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT: [3] %RU2_B2
; CHECK-POSTDOM-NEXT:Roots: %EXIT %RU1_B1 %RU2_B1